240529 SE Human Betterment Utopias (P4) (2023S)
Eugenic ideas and concepts from the political left and the political right
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Participation at first session is obligatory!The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used for courses with continuous assessment.
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mi 01.02.2023 00:01 bis Mo 20.02.2023 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Fr 17.03.2023 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
The course will be conducted in presence. Due to the respective applicable distance regulations and other measures, adjustments may be made.
Mittwoch
15.03.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch
29.03.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch
19.04.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch
03.05.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch
10.05.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Mittwoch
17.05.
09:00 - 13:00
Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
To finish the seminar successfully:
group-presentation + handout + paper + compulsory attendance
Aids permitted: all books, articles, and documents on moodle
1) presentation + handout (group work!): 40 points
2) term paper (group work): 30 points
3) participate actively during the seminar blocks + compulsory attendance: 30 pointsIn order to receive a passing grade, you need at least 50 points and at least half the points of each partial performance (1-3).
sehr gut: 88-100 Punkte
gut: 75-87 Punkte
befriedigend: 62-74 Punkte
genügend: 50-61 Punkte
nicht genügend: 0-49 Punkte
group-presentation + handout + paper + compulsory attendance
Aids permitted: all books, articles, and documents on moodle
1) presentation + handout (group work!): 40 points
2) term paper (group work): 30 points
3) participate actively during the seminar blocks + compulsory attendance: 30 pointsIn order to receive a passing grade, you need at least 50 points and at least half the points of each partial performance (1-3).
sehr gut: 88-100 Punkte
gut: 75-87 Punkte
befriedigend: 62-74 Punkte
genügend: 50-61 Punkte
nicht genügend: 0-49 Punkte
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
To finish the seminar successfully:
group-presentation + handout + paper + compulsory attendance
Aids permitted: all books, articles, and documents on moodle
1) presentation + handout (group work!): 40 points
2) term paper (group work): 30 points
3) participate actively during the seminar blocks + compulsory attendance: 30 pointsIn order to receive a passing grade, you need at least 50 points and at least half the points of each partial performance (1-3).
sehr gut: 88-100 Punkte
gut: 75-87 Punkte
befriedigend: 62-74 Punkte
genügend: 50-61 Punkte
nicht genügend: 0-49 Punkte
group-presentation + handout + paper + compulsory attendance
Aids permitted: all books, articles, and documents on moodle
1) presentation + handout (group work!): 40 points
2) term paper (group work): 30 points
3) participate actively during the seminar blocks + compulsory attendance: 30 pointsIn order to receive a passing grade, you need at least 50 points and at least half the points of each partial performance (1-3).
sehr gut: 88-100 Punkte
gut: 75-87 Punkte
befriedigend: 62-74 Punkte
genügend: 50-61 Punkte
nicht genügend: 0-49 Punkte
Prüfungsstoff
see Assessment & Minimum requirements and assessment criteria:
Literatur
-Allen, Ann Taylor. 1985. Mothers of the New Generation: Adele Schreiber, Helene Stöcker, and the Evolution of a German Idea of Motherhood, 1900-1914, Signs, Vol. 10, No. 3: 418-438.
-Bestard, Joan. 2004. Kinship and New Genetics: The Changing Meaning of Biogenetic Substance, in Social Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 3: 253-263.
-Braun, Kathrin (Hg.). 2011. Between Self-Determination and Social Technology. Medicine, Biopolitics and the New Techniques of Procedural Management. Bielefeld: transcript.
-Dyck, José van. 1995. Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent. Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
-Franklin, Sarah. 2013. Biological Relatives. IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
-Franklin, Sarah. 2003. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics, in Anthropological Theory, 3: 65-85.
-Lock, Margaret. 2012. From Genetics to Postgenomics and the Discovery of the New Social Body, in Inhorn, Marcia C./ Wentzell, Emily A. (Hg.): Medical Anthropology at the Intersections. Histories, Activisms, and Futures. Durham and London: Duke University Press: 129-160.
-Lorenz, Maren. 2008. Proto-Eugenic Thought and Breeding Utopias in The United States before 1870, in GHI Bulletin, No. 43: 67-90.
-MacKellar, Calum/Bechtel, Christopher (Hg.). 2016. The Ethics of the New Eugenics. New York: Berghahn.
-Mesner, Maria/Wolfgruber, Gudrun (Hg.). 2006. The Policies of Reproduction at the Turn of the 21st Century. The Cases of Finland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Austria and the US. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
-Muller, Hermann Joseph. 1939. The Geneticists Manifesto or Social Biology and Population Improvement.
-Rapp, Rayna. 2001. Gender, Body, Biomedicine: How Some Feminist Concerns Dragged Reproduction to the Center of Social Theory, in Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 15, No. 4: 466-477.
-Richardson, Angelique. 2003. Love and eugenics in the late nineteenth century: rational reproduction and the new woman, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-Samerski, Silja. 2009. Genetic Counseling and the Fiction of Choice: Taught Self‐Determination as a New Technique of Social Engineering, in Signs, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 34, No. 4: 735-761.
-Wecker, Regina/Braunschweig, Sabine/Imboden, Gabriela/Küchenhoff, Bernhard/Ritter, Hans Jakob (Hg.): Wie nationalsozialistisch ist die Eugenik? What is National Socialist about Eugenics? Internationale Debatten zur Geschichte der Eugenik im 20. Jahrhundert. International Debates on the History of Eugenics in the 20th Century. Wien, Köln, Weimar.
-Bestard, Joan. 2004. Kinship and New Genetics: The Changing Meaning of Biogenetic Substance, in Social Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 3: 253-263.
-Braun, Kathrin (Hg.). 2011. Between Self-Determination and Social Technology. Medicine, Biopolitics and the New Techniques of Procedural Management. Bielefeld: transcript.
-Dyck, José van. 1995. Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent. Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
-Franklin, Sarah. 2013. Biological Relatives. IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
-Franklin, Sarah. 2003. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics, in Anthropological Theory, 3: 65-85.
-Lock, Margaret. 2012. From Genetics to Postgenomics and the Discovery of the New Social Body, in Inhorn, Marcia C./ Wentzell, Emily A. (Hg.): Medical Anthropology at the Intersections. Histories, Activisms, and Futures. Durham and London: Duke University Press: 129-160.
-Lorenz, Maren. 2008. Proto-Eugenic Thought and Breeding Utopias in The United States before 1870, in GHI Bulletin, No. 43: 67-90.
-MacKellar, Calum/Bechtel, Christopher (Hg.). 2016. The Ethics of the New Eugenics. New York: Berghahn.
-Mesner, Maria/Wolfgruber, Gudrun (Hg.). 2006. The Policies of Reproduction at the Turn of the 21st Century. The Cases of Finland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Austria and the US. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
-Muller, Hermann Joseph. 1939. The Geneticists Manifesto or Social Biology and Population Improvement.
-Rapp, Rayna. 2001. Gender, Body, Biomedicine: How Some Feminist Concerns Dragged Reproduction to the Center of Social Theory, in Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 15, No. 4: 466-477.
-Richardson, Angelique. 2003. Love and eugenics in the late nineteenth century: rational reproduction and the new woman, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-Samerski, Silja. 2009. Genetic Counseling and the Fiction of Choice: Taught Self‐Determination as a New Technique of Social Engineering, in Signs, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 34, No. 4: 735-761.
-Wecker, Regina/Braunschweig, Sabine/Imboden, Gabriela/Küchenhoff, Bernhard/Ritter, Hans Jakob (Hg.): Wie nationalsozialistisch ist die Eugenik? What is National Socialist about Eugenics? Internationale Debatten zur Geschichte der Eugenik im 20. Jahrhundert. International Debates on the History of Eugenics in the 20th Century. Wien, Köln, Weimar.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: So 05.03.2023 13:48
Methods: Input, presentation (group work), final paper (group work), discussions