124263 KO Critical Media Analysis (2017S)
Bad Cultures
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Do 16.02.2017 00:00 bis Mi 22.02.2017 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Fr 31.03.2017 23:59
Details
max. 30 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Montag
06.03.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
20.03.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
27.03.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
03.04.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
24.04.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
08.05.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
15.05.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
22.05.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
29.05.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Freitag
09.06.
08:00 - 10:00
Raum 1 Anglistik UniCampus Hof 8 3E-EG-05
Montag
12.06.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
19.06.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Montag
26.06.
12:00 - 14:00
Helene-Richter-Saal UniCampus Hof 8 3G-EG-21
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
In this course we will retrace these variously subjugating and transgressive ideas of the inferior, the ephemeral, and the bad and explore how they allow a Culture Studies perspective to move out towards the margins of culture for the politics, identities, communities, and ways of living situated there. Students will gain a detailed literacy in the first principles of Cultural Media Analysis by exploring the genealogy of modern distinctions between the good, the bad, and the ugly. Together, we will discuss relevant questions: Are these distinctions between good and bad essential or non-essential? What is their history? How is this history organised by ideology and power relations? In what ways are our concepts of the bad shaped by normative categories of gender, sexuality, class, and race? How can we theorise the pleasures of the bad, its potential for transgressive politics and its amenity to subcultural group identities and ways of living?Central to these theoretical inquiries will be Pierre Bourdieus definition of taste as an ideological category, Umberto Ecos analysis of Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage and definitions of camp aesthetics from Susan Sontag to Richard Dyer. However, this vantage also allows us to review, in detail, a number of crucial Culture Studies perspectives and aesthetic lenses, from subcultures, bricolage, and culture jamming, through the cultural injunctions of Leavisism, the Frankfurt School, and postmodernism, to Richard Hoggarts pluralistic emphasis on the communal and everyday and Raymond Williams Structure of Feeling. Together, by taking a closer look at the cults and communities that arise around bad culture, we will gain greater insight into the ways in which we reveal ourselves to one another and forge communities.The syllabus is open to student input and feedback depending on individual research projects and presentations, but the central outline of the course is as follows. We will begin with the cult of Amanda McKittrick Ros, whose purple prose was so beloved by Lewis and Tolkien that they would hold sporadic Ros reading competitions, in which the winner was the member who could read from one of her novels for the longest without breaking into laughter. Ros will allow us to consider not only the aesthetic and social conditions of cult communities, but also the ways in which such phenomena can be marked by gender, class, and race. We will also consider similarly received texts in diverse genres, such as the infamous The Eye of Argon, the worst fantasy novel ever which has become the subject of a science fiction convention party game in which the winner is the person who can read the story aloud the longest without laughing. Considering Bad Culture and Modernism, we will discuss the intentionally bad puns of Myles na gCopaleen, James Joyces pastiches of bad-writing in Eumaeus, and the aesthetic of comic failure that underpins Samuel Becketts prose and plays. Turning to post-modern cultures, we will consider the rise of mass culture and genre from comic books and romance novels to trashy B-movies (Ed Wood) and the cults/communities that arose around them. After a discussion of Pop Art and Outsider Art, we will look at the camp politics of Rocky Horror Picture Show and John Waters (Pink Flamingos, Hairspray), the countercultural scenes of avant-garde music and comedy that embrace the bad as a critique of mainstream culture (The Shaggs, ZCR, Tim & Eric, Neil Hamburger, On Cinema at the Cinema, Decker). Finally, we will turn to the present Remix Culture, to discuss lo-fi meme aesthetics, online fan-fics, viral hits, YouTube communities, and contemporary modes of culture jamming and culture hacking.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Presentation, discussion, essay, poster.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Prüfungsstoff
Literatur
Selected Primary bibliographyPrint
Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London: Routledge, 1984).
Roger Cardinal, Outsider Art (New York: Praeger, 1972).
Corey K. Creekmur and Alexander Doty (eds.), Out in Culture: Gay, Lesbian and Queer Essays on Popular Culture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995).
Richard Dyer, Only Entertainment (London: Routledge, 2002).
Umberto Eco, Casablanca: Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage, in Faith in Fakes: Essays, trans. William Weaver (London: Secker and Warburg, 1986), 197200.
Roxane Gay, Bad Feminist: Essays (Harper Perennial, 2014).
Douglas Mao and Rebecca L. Walkowitz (eds.), Bad Modernisms, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).
Mark OConnell, Epic Fail: Bad Art, Viral Fame, and the History of the Worst Thing Ever (The Millions, 2015).
Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation, and Other Essays (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1966).
Raymond Williams, The Analysis of Culture, in John Storey (ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader. 2nd Edition (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1998), 4856.
Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London: Routledge, 1984).
Roger Cardinal, Outsider Art (New York: Praeger, 1972).
Corey K. Creekmur and Alexander Doty (eds.), Out in Culture: Gay, Lesbian and Queer Essays on Popular Culture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995).
Richard Dyer, Only Entertainment (London: Routledge, 2002).
Umberto Eco, Casablanca: Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage, in Faith in Fakes: Essays, trans. William Weaver (London: Secker and Warburg, 1986), 197200.
Roxane Gay, Bad Feminist: Essays (Harper Perennial, 2014).
Douglas Mao and Rebecca L. Walkowitz (eds.), Bad Modernisms, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).
Mark OConnell, Epic Fail: Bad Art, Viral Fame, and the History of the Worst Thing Ever (The Millions, 2015).
Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation, and Other Essays (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1966).
Raymond Williams, The Analysis of Culture, in John Storey (ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader. 2nd Edition (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1998), 4856.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Studium: UF 344, BA 612, BEd 046
Code/Modul: UF 4.2.5-426, BA07.3; BEd 08a.2, BEd 08b.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-4260
Code/Modul: UF 4.2.5-426, BA07.3; BEd 08a.2, BEd 08b.1
Lehrinhalt: 12-4260
Letzte Änderung: Mi 09.09.2020 00:22